
The best countries for clean energy production
Which countries have the best share of clean energy production?
The United Nation’s Paris Agreement plan was to try and limit global warming to under 1.5°C by 2030, but the latest data has experts worried that ship has sailed, and average global temperatures will increase by more than 1.5°C in the next few years.1World on course to breach 1.5°C before 2030, and other climate and nature news. World Economic Forum. 2026.
Some countries have done a lot over the years to increase the share of renewables in their energy mix, moving toward cleaner, environmentally friendly and sustainable sources of power. Other countries have lagged behind, barely moving the needle as they rely heavily on fossil fuels to meet their energy demands. Energy comparison experts at iSelect have looked at 50 countries across the world, indexing them by the proportion of their energy generation that comes from clean energy sources compared to fossil fuels.
Countries with the best share of energy production from clean energy
1. Denmark
Denmark has the best share of clean energy production, topping our index with a score of 6.23 out of 10. Denmark generates 58.7% of its energy needs from wind power and 22.1% from bioenergy, the highest amounts of wind and bioenergy from any of the 50 countries on the list. Denmark also barely uses any gas or coal, with both making up less than one per cent of the country’s energy mix. When adding the percentages of all clean energy and adding all fossil fuels, and comparing them together, Denmark has a difference of 88.40% in favour of fossil fuels.
2. Finland
Finland was the second-best nation in the clean energy countries index, scoring 5.68 out of 10. Like Denmark, Finland had very low amounts of fossil fuels in its energy production mix, with 1.2% coming from gas and 0.2% from coal. Finland’s biggest source of energy is nuclear power, making up 39.9% of all energy generated in the Arctic country, with wind power making up 27.4%. Hydroelectricity made up 15.1%, while bioenergy accounted for 12.6%. Denmark’s clean energy balance difference is actually higher than Denmark’s at 92.70%.
3. New Zealand
The third highest-ranking country for clean energy was New Zealand, which finished close on Finland’s heels with a score of 5.67 out of 10. New Zealand’s biggest source of power is hydroelectricity, accounting for more than half of the country’s energy production at 54.8%. The next biggest category was ‘other renewables’ at 21.8%, while wind power sat under 10% at 9.74%. Like the other nations at the top of the index, New Zealand uses very little coal, gas or other fossil fuels. When all sources of clean energy are combined and compared to all sources of fossil fuels, New Zealand has an overall positive balance of 72.24% in clean energy.
Clean energy countries index 2026
| Ranking | Country | Solar | Wind | Hydro | Bioenergy | Other renewables | Nuclear | Gas | Coal | Other fossil fuels | Clean energy difference | Index Score |
| 1 | Denmark | 13.30% | 58.70% | 0.06% | 22.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.38% | 0.43% | 4.95% | 88.40% | 6.23 |
| 2 | Finland | 1.19% | 27.40% | 15.10% | 12.60% | 0.16% | 39.90% | 1.15% | 0.19% | 2.31% | 92.70% | 5.68 |
| 3 | New Zealand | 0.85% | 9.74% | 54.80% | 1.32% | 21.80% | 0.00% | 8.66% | 1.13% | 1.48% | 77.24% | 5.67 |
| 4 | Switzerland | 12.10% | 0.22% | 52.30% | 1.60% | 1.60% | 29.90% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 1.89% | 95.41% | 5.53 |
| 5 | Sweden | 2.60% | 22.80% | 40.10% | 5.85% | 0.00% | 27.40% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 1.16% | 97.53% | 5.52 |
| 6 | Brazil | 12% | 15.60% | 51.70% | 7.33% | 0.00% | 2.11% | 7.29% | 2.28% | 1.68% | 77.49% | 5.47 |
| 7 | Portugal | 17.30% | 26.80% | 29.70% | 6.71% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 16.50% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 61.76% | 5.46 |
| 8 | Austria | 14.10% | 11.30% | 51.80% | 6.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 12.00% | 4.00% | 0.00% | 67.10% | 5.43 |
| 9 | France | 5.61% | 8.15% | 10.40% | 1.80% | 0.00% | 68.80% | 3.03% | 0.30% | 1.82% | 89.61% | 5.41 |
| 10 | Belgium | 14.30% | 18.30% | 0.81% | 7.16% | 0.00% | 32.90% | 26.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 46.98% | 5.38 |
| 11 | Chile | 25.10% | 13.10% | 22.20% | 5.68% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 15.30% | 17.80% | 0.56% | 32.72% | 5.32 |
| 12 | Spain | 21.90% | 20.40% | 11.40% | 2.23% | 0.00% | 18.80% | 21.60% | 0.32% | 3.48% | 49.33% | 5.28 |
| 13 | Norway | 0.33% | 8.44% | 90.00% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.44% | 97.92% | 5.12 |
| 14 | Germany | 17.90% | 27.20% | 3.91% | 10.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.50% | 20.60% | 3.78% | 18.23% | 5.02 |
| 15 | Ukraine | 6.61% | 29.40% | 1.90% | 14.10% | 0.00% | 12.40% | 31.10% | 0.00% | 4.37% | 28.94% | 5.00 |
| 16 | Pakistan | 21.40% | 2.19% | 23.10% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 14.00% | 23.00% | 15.00% | 2.00% | 22.03% | 4.85 |
| 17 | Netherlands | 21.10% | 25.00% | 0.00% | 5.08% | 0.00% | 2.96% | 34.90% | 7.08% | 3.88% | 8.28% | 4.84 |
| 18 | Romania | 9.78% | 12.00% | 24.30% | 0.98% | 0.00% | 20.50% | 16.90% | 15.20% | 0.36% | 35.10% | 4.81 |
| 19 | Ukraine | 4.56% | 1.27% | 9.98% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 55.80% | 6.44% | 20.90% | 0.48% | 44.49% | 4.79 |
| 20 | Czechia | 5.82% | 0.76% | 2.27% | 8.02% | 0.00% | 42.40% | 5.41% | 35.30% | 0.21% | 18.35% | 4.74 |
| 21 | Canada | 1.56% | 7.89% | 52.80% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 13.10% | 17.90% | 3.99% | 1.17% | 53.89% | 4.72 |
| 22 | Colombia | 5.09% | 0.17% | 69.20% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.80% | 6.12% | 3.10% | 54.00% | 4.68 |
| 23 | Italy | 16.80% | 8.11% | 15.70% | 5.89% | 2.15% | 0.00% | 47.40% | 1.35% | 2.54% | -2.64% | 4.66 |
| 24 | Peru | 3.03% | 3.49% | 56.00% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 36.10% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 27.28% | 4.44 |
| 25 | Türkiye | 10.50% | 11.10% | 16.20% | 2.40% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 22.10% | 34.30% | 0.29% | -13.48% | 4.35 |
| Greece | 19.80% | 20.90% | 5.90% | 1.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 40.30% | 4.73% | 7.22% | -4.42% | 4.35 | |
| 26 | Ireland | 4.81% | 38.00% | 2.10% | 3.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 48.40% | 0.51% | 2.97% | -3.68% | 4.29 |
| 27 | Australia | 19.70% | 13.70% | 4.26% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.40% | 42.70% | 2.22% | -22.60% | 4.28 |
| 28 | United States | 8.60% | 10.30% | 5.35% | 1.02% | 0.39% | 17.40% | 40.00% | 16.00% | 1.00% | -13.94% | 4.21 |
| 29 | China | 11.10% | 10.70% | 13.20% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 4.60% | 3.00% | 55.00% | 1.00% | -16.89% | 4.17 |
| 30 | South Korea | 6.05% | 0.58% | 0.61% | 3.15% | 0.00% | 29.60% | 27.90% | 31.10% | 0.95% | -19.96% | 4.08 |
| Vietnam | 7.36% | 4.62% | 33.00% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.21% | 48.30% | 0.20% | -9.40% | 4.08 | |
| 31 | Japan | 9.81% | 1.25% | 7.18% | 5.33% | 0.00% | 9.14% | 32.80% | 32.00% | 2.46% | -34.55% | 3.97 |
| 32 | Poland | 11.30% | 13.90% | 0.98% | 4.91% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 14.40% | 50.60% | 3.73% | -37.51% | 3.93 |
| 33 | UAE | 8.58% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 22.90% | 68.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | -36.59% | 3.92 |
| 34 | Argentina | 3.36% | 12.20% | 17.10% | 1.93% | 0.00% | 7.03% | 53.60% | 0.88% | 3.86% | -16.72% | 3.89 |
| 36 | India | 9.41% | 5.00% | 8.55% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 2.59% | 2.33% | 70.80% | 0.00% | -46.47% | 3.74 |
| 37 | Philippines | 2.44% | 1.19% | 10.30% | 1.18% | 8.20% | 0.00% | 17.30% | 58.70% | 0.76% | -53.45% | 3.70 |
| 38 | Russia | 0.24% | 0.30% | 16.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 18.30% | 44.70% | 18.40% | 1.21% | -28.77% | 3.67 |
| 39 | Thailand | 5.30% | 1.81% | 4.05% | 5.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 65.50% | 17.80% | 0.07% | -66.80% | 3.58 |
| 40 | Indonesia | 0.36% | 0.13% | 7.34% | 5.74% | 4.51% | 0.00% | 18.50% | 61.50% | 1.92% | -63.84% | 3.49 |
| 41 | South Africa | 8.02% | 4.66% | 0.75% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 81.40% | 0.80% | -64.37% | 3.42 |
| 42 | Malaysia | 2.24% | 0.00% | 17.50% | 0.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 33.80% | 44.60% | 1.03% | -58.81% | 3.34 |
| Mexico | 7.38% | 5.99% | 8.05% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 2.85% | 61.60% | 3.05% | 9.41% | -48.12% | 3.34 | |
| 43 | Taiwan | 5.59% | 4.15% | 1.91% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 48.70% | 36.20% | 1.61% | -73.01% | 3.28 |
| 44 | Singapore | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 91.10% | 0.95% | 2.44% | -89.00% | 3.07 |
| 45 | Egypt | 3.10% | 3.78% | 6.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 79.60% | 0.00% | 7.36% | -73.95% | 2.95 |
| 46 | Hong Kong | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 64.10% | 33.60% | 1.20% | -98.29% | 2.83 |
| 47 | Iran | 0.23% | 0.31% | 3.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.84% | 88.30% | 0.00% | 5.67% | -88.11% | 2.77 |
| 48 | Saudi Arabia | 1.81% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 63.30% | 0.00% | 34.50% | -95.64% | 1.38 |
How does Australia compare when it comes to the nation’s energy mix?
In the overall index, Australia ranks 27th overall, as the country currently generates most of its power from coal, which makes up almost half of all energy production at 42.7%. The next biggest source of energy is solar power at 19.7%, with gas following closely behind at 16.4%. Wind currently sits at 13.7%, while hydro is less than five per cent and bioenergy barely makes over one per cent. Adding the share of all clean energy and comparing that to all fossil fuels, Australia has a difference of 22.6% in favour of fossil fuels.
While Australia continues to generate most of its power from fossil fuels, the country is moving toward a greater share of renewable energy, with a plan to reach net-zero emissions by 2050.2Powering Australia. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. 2025.
From 2020 to 2025, Australia’s renewable energy generation grew from 22.6% to 39.5% of all electricity generation.3Australian electricity generation – fuel mix. Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. 2026. However, the Australian Government’s plans to pursue renewable energy to reduce emissions are hitting a snag. New renewable energy projects, especially wind, are failing to get off the ground, leading the Government to extend the life of coal-fired power plants beyond their originally planned closure dates to meet growing energy demand.4Wind project ‘drought’ puts Australia’s green energy targets in doubt. Daniel Mercer, Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2026.
The lowest three countries for clean energy production
1. Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia was the lowest ranked country for clean energy production, with a score of 1.53 out of 10. The vast majority of Saudi Arabia’s power comes from gas, which accounted for almost two thirds of all power generation, with other fossil fuels making up 34.5%. Less than 2% came from solar power. No other renewable power was used to generate energy in the country. The difference in clean energy vs fossil fuels was 95.64%.
2. Iran
The second-lowest country for clean energy production was Iran, which scored 2.15 out of 10 in the index, thanks to a small amount of solar (0.23%) and hydroelectricity (3.50%). However, the vast majority comes from gas (88.30%), followed by 5.70% from other fossil fuel sources. Comparing the difference between all fossil fuels and all clean energy sources was 88.11%
3. Hong Kong
Hong Kong was ranked the third-lowest for clean energy production. Like Saudi Arabia and Iran, Hong Kong had almost no renewable energy, but it gets most of its power from gas (64.1%), followed by coal (33.6%). This gives Hong Kong an index score of 2.07 out of 10. Totalling up all sources of fossil fuel in Hong Kong’s energy mix, and comparing that to the total of all clean energy sources had a clean energy difference of 98.29% in favour of fossil fuels.

“Clean renewable energy is better for the planet, but it’s not always able to meet the energy needs of different countries. The highest-ranking nations on the index have made significant investment in green power sources and have moved to decarbonise their energy mix.
“Australia’s own goal to be net-zero by 2050 keeps facing issues. The Government has been forced to extend the use of coal-fired power plants to meet energy demand, the Snowy Hydro 2.0 project has been severely delayed by multiple issues with construction, and the push for new data centres saw the Australian Government allow Queensland to use gas or coal, after previously wanting states and territories to use renewable energy to power these new infrastructure projects.5Queensland allowed to use coal, gas for data centres despite renewable push. Holly Tregenza, Clare Armstrong, Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2026
“Meanwhile, electricity prices for consumers aren’t getting any cheaper. Whether the power you use comes from clean renewables or fossil fuels, Australians who can, should absolutely compare and switch to a better deal where available to save money on their energy bills.”
Julia Paszka
General Manager – Utilities at iSelect
Written by:
Sarah Grealy
Digital Public Relations Specialist
0413 363 690
Sarah is our Digital Public Relations Specialist, and brings more than a decade of experience in the insurance comparison industry to iSelect.
With a passion for storytelling through data-driven insights, Sarah strives to empower Aussies with practical guides and tips.
About the data
We sourced data for 50 countries from across the globe for energy sources and their share of each nation’s energy mix. These figures were used to calculate an overall index score. For each type of energy, the 50 nations were assigned a score between 0 and 10 based on the percentage of that type of energy relative to other countries. The clean energy difference totalled all percentages of clean energy into one number, then all sources of fossil fuels into another number, then combined the difference between the two of them. These scores were then used to create an overall index score out of 10, with higher scores indicating better performance in clean energy.
The way scores are given are listed below:
-For clean energy sources – solar, wind, hydroelectricity, bioenergy, other renewables and nuclear, the higher the percentage, the greater the score out of 10.
-For fossil fuels – gas, coal, and other fossil fuels, the higher the percentage, the lower the score out of 10.
The energy production by generation sources were sourced from Ember Electricity Data Explorer.
iSelect does not compare all energy insurance providers or policies in the market. The availability of policies will change from time to time. Not all policies available from its providers are compared by iSelect and due to commercial arrangements, your stated needs and circumstances, not all policies compared by iSelect are available to all customers. Some policies and special offers are available only from iSelect’s contact centre or website. Click here to view iSelect’s range of providers.
About 
At iSelect, we’re passionate about making Aussies’ lives easier by saving them time, effort and money. We are Australia’s go-to destination for comparison across insurance, utilities and personal finance products made available from our range of providers. Our service is provided at no cost to the customer.
iSelect does not compare all energy providers or plans in the market. The availability of plans may change from time to time, depending on who iSelect’s providers are and what plans they make available to iSelect. Not all plans made available from iSelect providers may be compared by iSelect either due to commercial arrangements, area or availability, so not all plans or providers compared by iSelect will be available to all customers. Some plans and special offers are available only from iSelect’s contact centre or website. Energy plans are available only for properties located in eligible areas of Victoria, New South Wales, South East Queensland, South Australia and ACT. Click here to view iSelect’s range of providers.