
Energy Efficient Homes
Where are Australia’s most energy-efficient places to live?
Having an energy-efficient home directly influences your energy bill — and higher efficiency typically means lower costs. While there are steps you can take to improve efficiency, like investing in solar panels or upgrading to energy-efficient appliances, many of the factors that shape your home’s energy efficiency are outside your control. The age of your home, the type of property you live in, and even the climate of your region all play a significant role in how much energy your household uses.
So, how much does where you live actually matter?
Energy comparison service iSelect, analysed 10 factors across six categories to reveal which parts of Australia have the most energy-efficient homes, and what it costs to live in them.
Key takeaways
- When it comes to understanding where the most energy-efficient homes are in Australia, location plays a major role. Regions in Queensland and Western Australia consistently outperform others thanks to strong solar adoption, newer housing, and favourable climates. Meanwhile, older homes and lower renewable uptake continue to hold back many metropolitan and southern areas.
- Queensland and Western Australia dominate the rankings, each claiming five of the top ten most energy-efficient regions nationally.
- The Sunshine Coast ranks as Australia’s most energy-efficient region, delivering consistently strong performance across solar adoption, climate, and housing factors.
- High solar panel uptake is a key driver of energy efficiency, with leading regions often recording solar installations on 60-70% of dwellings.
- Older housing stock and lower renewable adoption significantly reduce energy efficiency, particularly in capital cities and established suburbs.
- Energy-efficient areas aren’t always more expensive to buy a home, with several top-performing regions, such as Gympie and Fraser Coast, offering median house prices below the national average.
The areas with the most energy-efficient homes in Australia
| LGA name | State | Renewable Energy Adoption Score /100 | Urban Form & Density Score /100 | Residential Construction Efficiency Score /100 | Environmental Efficiency Score /100 | Legacy Housing Stock Score /100 | Climate Adjustment /100 | Index Score /100 |
| Sunshine Coast | QLD | 59.85 | 74.90 | 62.35 | 69.25 | 27.09 | 80.57 | 86.01 |
| Boddington | WA | 58.51 | 36.69 | 87.42 | 36.52 | 31.34 | 65.92 | 82.71 |
| Fraser Coast | QLD | 57.91 | 58.33 | 76.06 | 62.37 | 17.15 | 67.89 | 81.64 |
| Augusta Margaret River | WA | 40.98 | 48.92 | 88.89 | 57.60 | 31.76 | 100.00 | 80.51 |
| Gympie | QLD | 59.54 | 50.31 | 76.19 | 53.39 | 18.02 | 74.02 | 80.43 |
| Murray | WA | 69.69 | 47.29 | 60.16 | 37.30 | 27.56 | 76.72 | 80.13 |
| Moreton Bay | QLD | 53.68 | 73.12 | 63.64 | 60.85 | 24.20 | 79.57 | 80.06 |
| Chittering | WA | 79.70 | 27.42 | 53.43 | 15.49 | 44.55 | 69.65 | 80.03 |
| Bundaberg | QLD | 54.17 | 59.34 | 80.89 | 42.50 | 15.83 | 66.75 | 79.27 |
| Serpentine-Jarrahdale | WA | 70.21 | 37.62 | 55.72 | 35.24 | 41.71 | 74.52 | 79.21 |
When it comes to energy efficiency, the Sunshine Coast takes the top spot. With an overall energy-efficiency score of 86.01 out of 100, the coastal QLD region stands out not by dominating any single category, but by delivering consistently strong performance across all of them. The region has a 66.3% solar panel density, a healthy tree canopy coverage at 55.4%, and relatively low climate demand.
Looking across the national top 10, Queensland and Western Australia each claim five spots, with no other state or territory getting a look-in. QLD’s contingent — Sunshine Coast, Fraser Coast, Gympie, Moreton Bay, and Bundaberg — are strong on rooftop solar, with panel density ranging from 60% to 69%. However, WA’s trio of Serpentine-Jarrahdale, Chittering, and Murray all exceed the 70% mark.
Western Australia’s highest-ranked LGAs aren’t just solar-savvy, they’re also building better homes. Augusta Margaret River and Boddington lead the entire top 10 on new construction efficiency, scoring 88.89 and 87.42, respectively, backed by Energy Star ratings of 7.2 and 7.1. Boddington, ranked 2nd nationally with a score of 82.71, also impresses with 50.8% solar panel uptake and 50.2% solar hot water systems. It’s pretty impressive considering the area is one of the least densely populated areas on the list, at just 0.42 dwellings per km².
The areas with the least energy-efficient homes in Australia
Not every region is soaking up the sun quite so productively. The MacDonnell area in the rural Northern Territory, which is home to Uluru, ranks as Australia’s least energy-efficient region, scoring consistently low across the board. It’s particularly notable for its renewable energy adoption, ranking second-lowest in the country.
In fact, all ten of the least energy-efficient LGAs sit in regional Australia, spread across the Northern Territory, Queensland, Tasmania and South Australia. These aren’t areas lacking in sunshine or space, but they are areas where the infrastructure and investment needed to convert that potential into clean, efficient energy haven’t yet caught up.
The first metropolitan area to appear at the least-efficient end of the index is Woollahra in Sydney, ranking 15th from the bottom with a score of 34.43 out of 100. It’s a surprising entry for one of Australia’s most affluent suburbs, and a good example of how high-density, older housing stock can offset any advantages that city living might otherwise bring.
Every central capital city LGA ranks outside the top 40 most energy-efficient places to live. Brisbane is the standout performer at rank 45, but Adelaide (117th), Melbourne (229th), and Sydney (272nd) all sit in the mid-to-lower end of the index. The pattern is pretty consistent — despite strong scores in urban density, capital cities’ central LGAs are dragged down by lower rooftop solar adoption and a higher share of pre-1980 housing stock, which are two of the index’s most heavily weighted categories due to their impact on energy efficiency.
The areas with the most energy-efficient homes in New South Wales
| LGA name | State | Renewable Energy Adoption Score /100 | Urban Form & Density Score /100 | Residential Construction Efficiency Score /100 | Environmental Efficiency Score /100 | Legacy Housing Stock Score /100 | Climate Adjustment /100 | Index Score /100 |
| Lismore | NSW | 60.71 | 63.68 | 52.97 | 59.79 | 29.86 | 81.74 | 78.63 |
| Byron | NSW | 60.52 | 67.78 | 34.09 | 71.78 | 32.20 | 87.55 | 72.82 |
| Port Stephens | NSW | 45.03 | 69.36 | 56.49 | 58.86 | 34.12 | 83.41 | 72.53 |
| Bellingen | NSW | 53.80 | 51.32 | 54.09 | 86.41 | 30.07 | 71.08 | 72.37 |
| Tweed | NSW | 64.51 | 74.01 | 19.43 | 73.70 | 38.87 | 85.54 | 72.16 |
| Port Macquarie-Hastings | NSW | 57.47 | 66.57 | 34.49 | 79.98 | 33.52 | 82.74 | 71.28 |
| Cessnock | NSW | 43.50 | 58.39 | 51.82 | 66.11 | 51.07 | 77.50 | 71.06 |
| Richmond Valley | NSW | 54.21 | 56.98 | 43.38 | 66.11 | 34.52 | 74.95 | 68.73 |
| Singleton | NSW | 47.62 | 52.30 | 57.42 | 52.75 | 33.56 | 69.47 | 67.57 |
| Nambucca Valley | NSW | 50.04 | 58.00 | 42.82 | 83.48 | 30.80 | 80.04 | 66.98 |
Within New South Wales, Lismore leads the pack as the state’s most energy-efficient region, placing 12th nationally with a score of 78.63. It earns its stripes through strong renewable adoption, with a 61.0% solar panel density and 38.8% solar hot water systems, combined with favourable climate conditions and moderate housing density.
Coming in second for the state is Byron, ranked 28th nationally with a score of 72.82. It pairs high renewable uptake (59.3% solar) with one of the strongest tree canopy scores in the state at 57.4%, which is great for the environment, though its relatively low construction efficiency score of 34.09 shows there’s still room for better buildings. Port Stephens rounds out the NSW top three at 29th nationally (72.53), holding its own with a well-balanced profile across solar adoption, urban form, and low climate demand.
That said, NSW as a whole tends to sit in the middle of the road when it comes to solar penetration, with an average solar panel density of 41.5%. It’s enough to perform respectably, but not quite enough to keep pace with the solar heavyweights of Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia, where rooftop panel coverage is consistently higher across the board.
The areas with the most energy-efficient homes in victoria
| LGA name | State | Renewable Energy Adoption Score /100 | Urban Form & Density Score /100 | Residential Construction Efficiency Score /100 | Environmental Efficiency Score /100 | Legacy Housing Stock Score /100 | Climate Adjustment /100 | Index Score /100 |
| Merri-bek | VIC | 18.49 | 92.59 | 53.46 | 18.83 | 100.00 | 73.31 | 74.14 |
| Wyndham | VIC | 53.40 | 71.86 | 46.10 | 10.53 | 52.97 | 71.46 | 73.56 |
| Melton | VIC | 61.10 | 66.58 | 45.89 | 11.05 | 33.00 | 63.25 | 70.53 |
| Casey | VIC | 47.50 | 71.81 | 45.69 | 20.57 | 45.50 | 71.77 | 68.06 |
| Cardinia | VIC | 45.28 | 61.89 | 45.30 | 34.20 | 36.72 | 65.28 | 61.48 |
| East Gippsland | VIC | 49.74 | 47.53 | 50.44 | 70.71 | 16.72 | 47.03 | 58.71 |
| Hume | VIC | 39.91 | 71.87 | 45.59 | 10.35 | 33.07 | 62.74 | 57.17 |
| Whittlesea | VIC | 39.17 | 72.77 | 46.10 | 24.34 | 28.57 | 58.78 | 56.83 |
| Moira | VIC | 47.66 | 52.24 | 48.80 | 10.27 | 31.14 | 52.36 | 56.69 |
| Mitchell | VIC | 48.11 | 52.99 | 44.73 | 22.83 | 29.35 | 51.83 | 55.87 |
The inner-Melbourne LGA, Merri-bek, tops the Victorian rankings at 22nd nationally with a score of 74.14, despite having one of the lowest solar adoption rates in the top performers at just 18.7%. What it lacks in rooftop panels, it more than makes up for in density, with 1,291 dwellings per km² and an urban form and density score of 92.59.
Wyndham comes in second for the state (25th nationally) and tells a more balanced story. The area has stronger renewable uptake at 42.9% solar and 49.6% solar hot water systems, paired with solid urban density. Melton rounds out Victoria’s top three at 40th nationally, with one of the state’s highest rates of renewable hot water systems at 60.9%, alongside 46.4% solar panel density and a healthy urban score.
Urban density is the engine driving performance, but low solar adoption, with an average of 33% across the state’s local government areas, puts a limit on how high Victorian regions can climb compared to the national leaders.
The areas with the most energy-efficient homes in Queensland
| LGA name | State | Renewable Energy Adoption Score /100 | Urban Form & Density Score /100 | Residential Construction Efficiency Score /100 | Environmental Efficiency Score /100 | Legacy Housing Stock Score /100 | Climate Adjustment /100 | Index Score /100 |
| Sunshine Coast | QLD | 59.85 | 74.90 | 62.35 | 69.25 | 27.09 | 80.57 | 86.01 |
| Fraser Coast | QLD | 57.91 | 58.33 | 76.06 | 62.37 | 17.15 | 67.89 | 81.64 |
| Gympie | QLD | 59.54 | 50.31 | 76.19 | 53.39 | 18.02 | 74.02 | 80.43 |
| Moreton Bay | QLD | 53.68 | 73.12 | 63.64 | 60.85 | 24.20 | 79.57 | 80.06 |
| Bundaberg | QLD | 54.17 | 59.34 | 80.89 | 42.50 | 15.83 | 66.75 | 79.27 |
| Logan | QLD | 55.28 | 72.80 | 64.05 | 46.77 | 21.49 | 75.45 | 78.66 |
| Redland | QLD | 56.18 | 72.64 | 57.30 | 67.79 | 22.09 | 79.83 | 78.59 |
| Lockyer Valley | QLD | 64.28 | 50.39 | 64.39 | 45.47 | 20.27 | 72.84 | 77.66 |
| Douglas | QLD | 41.67 | 62.00 | 80.38 | 92.35 | 27.52 | 46.05 | 77.50 |
| Gold Coast | QLD | 49.82 | 83.60 | 52.04 | 61.28 | 28.42 | 82.34 | 76.32 |
Queensland’s top five regions all sit within the national top ten. Logan, Redland, Lockyer Valley, Douglas, and the Gold Coast make up the rest of the state’s top 10, and every one of them ranks inside the national top 20 with a score above 75 out of 100.
However, it’s not all sunshine and solar panels in the state. Despite Queensland’s impressive solar numbers, both Fraser Coast and Gympie rank outside the state’s top 20 for legacy housing — Fraser Coast at 21st with 213 pre-1980 dwellings per 1,000 people, and Gympie slightly ahead at 20th with 199. Somerset illustrates the problem best: it leads all of Queensland on solar panel density (74.8%) and its renewable energy score (65.01), yet sits only 15th in the stats’ index ranking because older housing stock drags its final score down.
The areas with the most energy-efficient homes in Western Australia
| LGA name | State | Renewable Energy Adoption Score /100 | Urban Form & Density Score /100 | Residential Construction Efficiency Score /100 | Environmental Efficiency Score /100 | Legacy Housing Stock Score /100 | Climate Adjustment /100 | Index Score /100 |
| Boddington | WA | 58.51 | 36.69 | 87.42 | 36.52 | 31.34 | 65.92 | 82.71 |
| Augusta Margaret River | WA | 40.98 | 48.92 | 88.89 | 57.60 | 31.76 | 100.00 | 80.51 |
| Murray | WA | 69.69 | 47.29 | 60.16 | 37.30 | 27.56 | 76.72 | 80.13 |
| Chittering | WA | 79.70 | 27.42 | 53.43 | 15.49 | 44.55 | 69.65 | 80.03 |
| Serpentine-Jarrahdale | WA | 70.21 | 37.62 | 55.72 | 35.24 | 41.71 | 74.52 | 79.21 |
| Rockingham | WA | 54.32 | 69.35 | 56.83 | 18.49 | 35.04 | 86.53 | 75.72 |
| Dardanup | WA | 53.37 | 53.87 | 61.16 | 41.37 | 35.58 | 77.56 | 74.14 |
| Swan | WA | 56.09 | 66.00 | 56.49 | 21.46 | 32.71 | 71.02 | 73.85 |
| Wanneroo | WA | 53.33 | 65.30 | 52.86 | 19.58 | 41.78 | 81.72 | 73.50 |
| Kalamunda | WA | 57.88 | 59.92 | 57.18 | 45.41 | 19.86 | 71.05 | 72.18 |
Like Queensland, WA’s top five energy-efficient regions also claim five spots in the national top 10. Rockingham, Dardanup, Swan, Wanneroo, and Kalamunda round out the state’s top 10. The trend across WA’s top performers is consistent: sky-high renewable adoption paired with very low density. Most leading regions exceed 60–70% solar penetration, but with density often sitting below 5 dwellings per km², urban efficiency can only go so far.
The areas with the most energy-efficient homes in South Australia
| LGA name | State | Renewable Energy Adoption Score /100 | Urban Form & Density Score /100 | Residential Construction Efficiency Score /100 | Environmental Efficiency Score /100 | Legacy Housing Stock Score /100 | Climate Adjustment /100 | Index Score /100 |
| Gawler | SA | 52.43 | 77.13 | 50.44 | 7.10 | 21.64 | 70.75 | 66.89 |
| Mitcham | SA | 52.79 | 79.20 | 47.74 | 30.48 | 13.10 | 74.96 | 66.61 |
| Salisbury | SA | 47.25 | 77.04 | 53.10 | 15.55 | 19.30 | 74.85 | 65.13 |
| Playford | SA | 49.20 | 72.79 | 53.22 | 9.12 | 21.15 | 71.66 | 64.88 |
| Onkaparinga | SA | 48.55 | 69.32 | 52.27 | 19.93 | 20.88 | 76.56 | 64.40 |
| Berri Barmera | SA | 49.76 | 61.46 | 58.44 | 5.63 | 20.07 | 66.95 | 63.35 |
| Marion | SA | 41.54 | 85.74 | 53.59 | 12.03 | 15.84 | 81.33 | 63.27 |
| Tea Tree Gully | SA | 45.98 | 73.75 | 53.22 | 17.87 | 17.56 | 72.54 | 62.81 |
| Unley | SA | 45.66 | 89.97 | 45.20 | 15.15 | 11.44 | 80.93 | 62.19 |
| Alexandrina | SA | 55.88 | 52.28 | 45.79 | 10.54 | 24.42 | 80.82 | 61.76 |
South Australia’s leading regions are no strangers to rooftop solar, but a few other factors keep them from cracking the national top 50. Gawler leads the state at 51st nationally with a score of 66.89, combining strong housing density (272 dwellings per km²) with solid solar adoption at 61.8%. Its main weak spot is environmental performance, with tree canopy coverage of just 5.8%.
Mitcham follows closely at 54th nationally (66.61), bringing even higher density at 332 dwellings per km² and solid construction quality with a 6.4-star energy rating. Where it loses ground is legacy housing, with 293 pre-1980 dwellings per 1,000 people; older homes are a consistent drag on its overall score.
South Australia ranks 5th overall out of the Aussie states for energy efficiency, due to low tree canopy and a high proportion of older homes creating recurring issues across the state.
The areas with the most energy-efficient homes in the Northern Territory
| LGA name | State | Renewable Energy Adoption Score /100 | Urban Form & Density Score /100 | Residential Construction Efficiency Score /100 | Environmental Efficiency Score /100 | Legacy Housing Stock Score /100 | Climate Adjustment /100 | Index Score /100 |
| Palmerston* | NT | 54.81 | 78.74 | 55.02 | 30.79 | n/a | 1.71 | 76.57 |
| Darwin | NT | 44.30 | 85.49 | 42.07 | 21.91 | 17.03 | 0.00 | 52.68 |
| Litchfield | NT | 39.24 | 44.29 | 54.49 | 32.92 | 23.42 | 3.66 | 46.43 |
| Katherine | NT | 27.68 | 52.69 | 60.71 | 15.08 | 17.48 | 7.65 | 40.86 |
| Alice Springs | NT | 32.82 | 74.83 | 14.09 | 4.76 | 14.76 | 39.14 | 29.21 |
| Roper Gulf* | NT | 10.82 | 38.22 | 58.04 | 13.43 | n/a | 9.87 | 27.23 |
| Barkly | NT | 12.46 | 31.00 | 63.70 | 4.59 | 21.69 | 19.31 | 26.72 |
| West Arnhem* | NT | 19.68 | 39.88 | 23.89 | 27.77 | n/a | 4.63 | 16.20 |
| MacDonnell* | NT | 7.19 | 27.29 | 23.35 | 1.90 | n/a | 34.24 | 15.00 |
The Northern Territory’s climate heavily works against even the best intentions to create energy-efficient homes. Palmerston leads the state at 16th nationally with a score of 76.57, an impressive result compared to the other regions, backed by strong urban density (194 dwellings per km²) and solid renewable adoption across both solar panels (43.9%) and hot water systems (48.4%). But even Palmerston can’t escape the NT’s biggest challenge: climate demand. With 3,615 annual degree days and a climate score of just 1.71 out of 100, the sheer cost of keeping cool puts a hard ceiling on how high any Territory region can climb.
Darwin tells an even starker story. Ranking 2nd in the Territory, it actually scores 0.00 for climate, the lowest in the entire dataset, reflecting just how intense its cooling requirements are. It’s not for lack of effort elsewhere; Darwin performs strongly on urban form (85.49) and has moderate renewable adoption. But when climate demand is that extreme, it overwhelms even the most efficient housing and density scores.
It’s a different story for the rest of the Territory. Five of the seven lowest-ranked regions in the entire country are all located in the Northern Territory, making it the least energy-efficient state overall. Low renewable energy adoption, sparse urban density, minimal tree canopy cover, and the demands of an extreme climate all contribute to pulling its rankings down.
The areas with the most energy-efficient homes in Tasmania
| LGA name | State | Renewable Energy Adoption Score /100 | Urban Form & Density Score /100 | Residential Construction Efficiency Score /100 | Environmental Efficiency Score /100 | Legacy Housing Stock Score /100 | Climate Adjustment /100 | Index Score /100 |
| Kingborough | TAS | 26.90 | 57.53 | 62.85 | 73.03 | 27.54 | 38.91 | 54.65 |
| Hobart | TAS | 20.82 | 82.19 | 58.41 | 59.76 | 15.20 | 32.48 | 49.94 |
| Launceston | TAS | 18.91 | 67.61 | 66.12 | 60.98 | 20.98 | 28.76 | 49.57 |
| George Town | TAS | 24.69 | 55.25 | 65.35 | 53.74 | 11.53 | 57.59 | 48.86 |
| Glenorchy | TAS | 18.11 | 75.11 | 64.47 | 56.37 | 15.69 | 23.22 | 47.85 |
| Latrobe | TAS | 19.33 | 52.95 | 63.91 | 58.09 | 25.23 | 45.98 | 47.09 |
| Huon Valley | TAS | 25.22 | 35.49 | 65.50 | 84.80 | 20.17 | 23.98 | 45.74 |
| West Tamar | TAS | 25.85 | 48.64 | 58.03 | 53.68 | 19.27 | 46.66 | 45.28 |
| Clarence | TAS | 22.97 | 61.41 | 58.80 | 30.98 | 17.12 | 52.12 | 45.11 |
| Waratah-Wynyard | TAS | 20.35 | 47.36 | 64.61 | 86.13 | 14.66 | 22.28 | 43.78 |
Energy efficiency looks a little different in Tasmania, mainly due to the cold. Kingborough leads the state at 150th nationally with a score of 54.65, with genuine strengths in tree canopy coverage at 58.4% and solid construction efficiency with a 6.6-star energy rating. But with just 29.0% solar panel density and 15.0% solar hot water uptake, renewable adoption is modest at best. With 2,250 annual degree days, Kingborough also receives a low climate score, likely reflecting the higher heating requirements that come with a cooler climate compared to mainland states.
Hobart follows in second place and Launceston third, both showing similar patterns— strong urban density and decent construction quality, undercut by low renewable adoption and high climate demand. This trend is shown across the state, resulting in Tasmania ranking as the second-lowest energy-efficient place to live. Until renewable alternatives better suited to Tasmania’s climate become more accessible, the island state will continue to sit well outside the national top 100 for energy-efficient homes.
The cost to live in Australia’s most energy-efficient areas
| Local Government Area | State | Index Score /100 | Median House Prices |
| Sunshine Coast | QLD | 86.01 | $962,655 |
| Boddington | WA | 82.71 | $330,833 |
| Fraser Coast | QLD | 81.64 | $469,105 |
| Augusta Margaret River | WA | 80.51 | $765,726 |
| Gympie | QLD | 80.43 | $539,747 |
| Murray | WA | 80.13 | $1,058,251 |
| Moreton Bay | QLD | 80.06 | $774,796 |
| Chittering | WA | 80.03 | $639,267 |
| Bundaberg | QLD | 79.27 | $428,139 |
| Serpentine-Jarrahdale | WA | 79.21 | $690,650 |
There’s a common assumption that energy-efficient living comes with a premium price tag; however, the data tells a different story. Of the top 50 most energy-efficient regions in the country, seven have median house prices below the national median of $480,719. Boddington, ranked 2nd nationally, has a median house price of just $330,833. Fraser Coast sits at $469,105, Bundaberg at $428,139, and Gladstone at $410,231 — all well below what most Australians picture when they think of a high-performing, efficient home.
The median house price across Australia’s top 10 most energy-efficient regions is $664,959 — a fraction of what you’d pay in central capital city LGA’s: Sydney ($1,670,348), Melbourne ($1,020,633), or Adelaide ($1,022,500), all of which rank well outside the top 100 for energy efficiency. That’s perhaps best illustrated by Sydney’s most expensive suburb. Mosman holds the title of Australia’s priciest LGA with a median of $3,915,000, yet ranks 328th out of 365 for energy efficiency.

“This research highlights just how much where you live shapes your energy efficiency, which in turn influences the price of your energy bills. That’s why comparing energy providers matters. Whether you’re in a sun-drenched region in Queensland or an older home in Sydney, there are always ways to make sure you’re on the right energy plan for your situation.
“The gap between Australia’s most and least energy-efficient regions is significant, and while not everyone can renovate their home or install solar overnight, switching to a better energy plan is something any Australian can do right now.
“Small changes at home can also make a real difference. From upgrading to energy-efficient appliances and improving insulation, to simply being more mindful of when and how you use power. Every bit adds up, and the savings can be significant over time.”
Julia Paszka
General Manager – Utilities at iSelect
About the data
To find the region with the most energy-efficient homes in Australia, we analysed every Local Government Area (LGA) across the country with at least 750 dwellings (a total of 452 areas), scoring each one across six categories that collectively determine how much energy a home is likely to use. The index draws on data from eight independent sources, including the Australian Photovoltaic Institute (APVI), the Clean Energy Regulator, the CSIRO, the Bureau of Meteorology, and the Australian Bureau of Statistics, with all figures representing the most recently available data at the time of analysis.
Renewable Energy Adoption (35%) is the biggest driver in the index, reflecting the central role solar technology plays in reducing household energy bills. This category combines three metrics: the percentage of dwellings in each LGA with a rooftop solar PV system installed (sourced from the APVI), the average solar generating capacity per dwelling in kilowatts (also APVI), and the proportion of homes fitted with a solar water heater or air source heat pump (sourced from the Clean Energy Regulator). LGAs where solar adoption is widespread and generating capacity is high scored strongly here.
Residential Construction Efficiency (25%) looks at the quality of new homes being built in each area, using two metrics from the CSIRO Australian Housing Data portal. The first is the average NatHERS energy star rating of new homes, a nationally recognised rating out of ten that measures how much energy a home needs for heating and cooling based on its design, orientation, and materials. The second is average floor area: all else being equal, larger homes cost more to heat and cool, so this acts as a proxy for the inherent energy demand of new residential construction. To ensure reliable averages, LGAs with fewer than 30 NatHERS certificates were excluded from this category.
Legacy Housing Stock (15%) captures the drag that older housing places on energy efficiency. Homes built before 1980 predate the introduction of minimum energy efficiency standards in Australian building codes and are significantly more likely to have inadequate insulation, single-glazed windows, and outdated heating and cooling systems. Using building counts from the Geoscience Australia National Exposure Information System, we calculated the number of pre-1980 structures per 1,000 residents in each LGA. Areas carrying a heavy legacy burden score lower, reflecting the structural inefficiency of their existing housing stock.
Urban Form and Density (15%) reflects the energy efficiency gains associated with compact, higher-density housing. Apartments and townhouses typically use less energy per household than detached homes, share walls that reduce heat loss, and tend to sit in areas with more efficient infrastructure. This category combines dwelling density, the number of dwellings per square kilometre, with the proportion of compact or higher-density dwellings in each LGA, both sourced from the ABS 2021 Census.
Environmental Efficiency (5%) measures tree canopy coverage: the proportion of each LGA covered by woody vegetation taller than two metres, drawn from the Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN) 2025 Woody Canopy Cover dataset. Canopy cover reduces the urban heat island effect — the tendency of built-up areas to retain heat — thereby lowering cooling demand during summer. LGAs with higher canopy coverage score better on this measure.
Climate Adjustment (5%) ensures LGAs are not disadvantaged simply for being located in a hotter or colder part of the country. Using gridded climate data from the Bureau of Meteorology’s Australian Gridded Climate Dataset, representing the 30-year average from 1991 to 2020, we calculated total annual degree days for each LGA, combining both heating degree days (how much warming is needed in cooler periods) and cooling degree days (how much cooling is needed in warmer periods) at a base temperature of 18°C. This provides a single figure for the total thermal demand of each area’s climate, which is factored into the final score to account for regional differences in geography.
Scoring and Comparability
All metrics were normalised to a score out of 100 using min-max normalisation, rescaling each value relative to the best and worst performing LGA in the dataset. For metrics where a lower value is better, such as floor area and pre-1980 buildings, scoring is inverted so that smaller values produce higher scores. Four metrics with heavily skewed distributions, including dwelling density and legacy housing stock, had a log transformation applied before normalisation to prevent extreme outliers from compressing the scores of the majority of LGAs. Where an LGA had no data for a particular metric, that metric was excluded, and the remaining metrics were reweighted proportionally, ensuring all LGAs remain comparable. Final scores were standardised across the full dataset using z-score normalisation, meaning every score reflects an LGA’s performance relative to all others, and is not an absolute measure of energy efficiency.
Median House Prices
Median house prices are included as a supplementary data point to contextualise the cost of living in Australia’s most and least energy-efficient areas. Figures represent the median sale price for all dwelling types and bedroom configurations combined, sourced from Microburbs as a rolling median as at June 2025. Where insufficient transaction volume exists to produce a reliable median, no price is recorded for that LGA. House price data is not used in the calculation of the Energy Efficiency Index and is provided for contextual purposes only.
iSelect does not compare all energy providers or plans in the market. The availability of plans may change from time to time, depending on who iSelect’s providers are and what plans they make available to iSelect. Not all plans made available from iSelect providers may be compared by iSelect either due to commercial arrangements, area or availability, so not all plans or providers compared by iSelect will be available to all customers. Some plans and special offers are available only from iSelect’s contact centre or website. Energy plans are available only for properties located in eligible areas of Victoria, New South Wales, South East Queensland, South Australia and ACT. Click here to view iSelect’s range of providers.